异常恢复 Oracle恢复Case 的一次实战记录
发现问题
某网友的数据库由于坏盘了，并且存储掉电，导致数据库无法open了。单看其数据库alert log的错误来看，是非常之简单的，如下:
Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018 Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 3 Seq 39 Reading mem 0 Mem# 0: /fs/fs/oradata/orcl/redo03.log Block recovery stopped at EOT rba 39.77.16 Block recovery completed at rba 39.77.16, scn 0.1002048587 ORACLE Instance orcl (pid = 8) - Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (9, 30) on object 9149. Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [6856], [0], [43], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 10:33:56 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [33], [36], [], [], [], [], [] Doing block recovery for file 2 block 713 Block recovery from logseq 39, block 82 to scn 1002048595
对于这种错误，很明显，屏蔽回滚段即可，屏蔽之后可顺利打开数据库，不过后面很快又会crash掉，因此重建undo也就绕过这个问题了。
打开数据库之后，再去观察数据库，会发现alert log有不少的错误，如下所示：
Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17147], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4120 Fri Oct 26 11:01:47 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121 Fri Oct 26 11:01:48 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121 Fri Oct 26 11:01:50 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:02:22 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:02:23 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kebm_mmon_main_1], [39], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-00039: error during periodic action ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:03:30 2018 Restarting dead background process MMON
除此之外，由于之外alert log有坏块报错，因此对system进行了dbv检查，发现确实存在少量坏块，如下：
DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Fri Oct 26 10:37:20 2018 Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = system01.dbf DBV-00200: Block, DBA 4255202, already marked corrupt Block Checking: DBA = 4258751, Block Type = KTB-managed data block data header at 0x11022a05c kdbchk: fsbo(596) wrong, (hsz 4178) Page 64447 failed with check code 6129 Block Checking: DBA = 4259386, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** kdxcofbo = 208 != 24 ---- end index block validation Page 65082 failed with check code 6401 Block Checking: DBA = 4269609, Block Type = Unlimited data segment header Incorrect extent count in the extent map: 16777317 Block Checking: DBA = 4269612, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** kdxcofbo = 224 != 216 ---- end index block validation Page 75308 failed with check code 6401 Block Checking: DBA = 4269615, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** actual rows locked by itl 2 = 1 != # in trans. header = 0 ---- end index block validation Page 75311 failed with check code 6401 Page 85271 is influx - most likely media corrupt Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d17 (file 1, block 85271) Fractured block found during dbv: Data in bad block: type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d17 last change scn: 0x0000.3afaf495 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x04 spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0 consistency value in tail: 0xfe830601 check value in block header: 0x96c6 computed block checksum: 0x3c6b Page 85383 is influx - most likely media corrupt Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d87 (file 1, block 85383) Fractured block found during dbv: Data in bad block: type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d87 last change scn: 0x0000.3b6b9d19 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x06 spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0 consistency value in tail: 0x970f0601 check value in block header: 0xe825 computed block checksum: 0x3c6b DBVERIFY - Verification complete Total Pages Examined : 640000 Total Pages Processed (Data) : 116312 Total Pages Failing (Data) : 1 Total Pages Processed (Index): 65914 Total Pages Failing (Index): 3 Total Pages Processed (Other): 64634 Total Pages Processed (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Failing (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Empty : 393138 Total Pages Marked Corrupt : 3 Total Pages Influx : 2 Highest block SCN : 1002028510 (0.1002028510)
这部分错误，其实处理起来也不困难，部分是业务表的index，但是其他的几乎都是AWR相关基表，有2个坏块跟是system相关的基表和索引，分别是I_H_OBJ#_COL#和COM$ ，HISTGRM$。
对于业务索引，很简单，直接drop 重建即可，对于这个sys的index，可以通过设置38003 event进行drop重建。
对于基表COM$,HISTGRM$，由于是非bootstrap$核心对象，其实也可以处理掉的。
处理方法
不过考虑到这种毕竟是存储掉电，undo异常的情况，还是重建库更稳妥一些。最后补充一点，这个库稍微有点奇葩的地方是全库1.2TB，其中有个表的LOB自动980GB，重建数据库是相对较慢的。对于大表，且有LOB自动，通常建议基于分片，否则会报ORA-01555错误的，如下是常用的一个基于rowid的分片脚本，供大家参考：
set verify off
undefine rowid_ranges
undefine segment_name
undefine owner
set head off
set pages 0
set trimspool on
select ‘where rowid between ”’ ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid1, c.bid1, 0) ||
”’ and ”’ ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid2, c.bid2, 9999) || ”” || ‘;’
from (select distinct b.rn,
first_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid1,
last_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid2,
first_value(decode(sign(range2 – range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn – a.range1) * a.chunks1),
a.bid)) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid1,
last_value(decode(sign(range2 – range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn – a.range1 + 1) * a.chunks1) – 1,
(a.bid + a.blocks – 1))) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid2
from (select fid,
bid,
blocks,
chunks1,
trunc((sum2 – blocks + 1 – 0.1) / chunks1) range1,
trunc((sum2 – 0.1) / chunks1) range2
from (select /*+ rule */
relative_fno fid,
block_id bid,
blocks,
sum(blocks) over() sum1,
trunc((sum(blocks) over()) / &&rowid_ranges) chunks1,
sum(blocks) over(order by relative_fno, block_id) sum2
from dba_extents
where segment_name = upper(‘&&segment_name’)
and owner = upper(‘&&owner’))
where sum1 > &&rowid_ranges) a,
(select rownum – 1 rn
from dual
connect by level <= &&rowid_ranges) b
where b.rn between a.range1 and a.range2) c,
(select max(data_object_id) oid
from dba_objects
where object_name = upper(‘&&segment_name’)
and owner = upper(‘&&owner’)
and data_object_id is not null) d
/
总结
发现问题
某网友的数据库由于坏盘了，并且存储掉电，导致数据库无法open了。单看其数据库alert log的错误来看，是非常之简单的，如下:
Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018 Recovery of Online Redo Log: Thread 1 Group 3 Seq 39 Reading mem 0 Mem# 0: /fs/fs/oradata/orcl/redo03.log Block recovery stopped at EOT rba 39.77.16 Block recovery completed at rba 39.77.16, scn 0.1002048587 ORACLE Instance orcl (pid = 8) - Error 600 encountered while recovering transaction (9, 30) on object 9149. Fri Oct 26 10:33:53 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [6856], [0], [43], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 10:33:56 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_smon_192644.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [4194], [33], [36], [], [], [], [], [] Doing block recovery for file 2 block 713 Block recovery from logseq 39, block 82 to scn 1002048595
对于这种错误，很明显，屏蔽回滚段即可，屏蔽之后可顺利打开数据库，不过后面很快又会crash掉，因此重建undo也就绕过这个问题了。
打开数据库之后，再去观察数据库，会发现alert log有不少的错误，如下所示：
Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17147], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:01:46 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4120 Fri Oct 26 11:01:47 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121 Fri Oct 26 11:01:48 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [KGHALO4], [0x11047F6F0], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-600 encountered when generating server alert SMG-4121 Fri Oct 26 11:01:50 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_m001_373218.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kdddgb5], [196650], [0], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:02:22 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:02:23 2018 Errors in file /fs/fs/oradata/admin/orcl/bdump/orcl_mmon_385148.trc: ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [kebm_mmon_main_1], [39], [], [], [], [], [], [] ORA-00039: error during periodic action ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [17114], [0x110549070], [], [], [], [], [], [] Fri Oct 26 11:03:30 2018 Restarting dead background process MMON
除此之外，由于之外alert log有坏块报错，因此对system进行了dbv检查，发现确实存在少量坏块，如下：
DBVERIFY: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Fri Oct 26 10:37:20 2018 Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved. DBVERIFY - Verification starting : FILE = system01.dbf DBV-00200: Block, DBA 4255202, already marked corrupt Block Checking: DBA = 4258751, Block Type = KTB-managed data block data header at 0x11022a05c kdbchk: fsbo(596) wrong, (hsz 4178) Page 64447 failed with check code 6129 Block Checking: DBA = 4259386, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** kdxcofbo = 208 != 24 ---- end index block validation Page 65082 failed with check code 6401 Block Checking: DBA = 4269609, Block Type = Unlimited data segment header Incorrect extent count in the extent map: 16777317 Block Checking: DBA = 4269612, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** kdxcofbo = 224 != 216 ---- end index block validation Page 75308 failed with check code 6401 Block Checking: DBA = 4269615, Block Type = KTB-managed data block **** actual rows locked by itl 2 = 1 != # in trans. header = 0 ---- end index block validation Page 75311 failed with check code 6401 Page 85271 is influx - most likely media corrupt Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d17 (file 1, block 85271) Fractured block found during dbv: Data in bad block: type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d17 last change scn: 0x0000.3afaf495 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x04 spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0 consistency value in tail: 0xfe830601 check value in block header: 0x96c6 computed block checksum: 0x3c6b Page 85383 is influx - most likely media corrupt Corrupt block relative dba: 0x00414d87 (file 1, block 85383) Fractured block found during dbv: Data in bad block: type: 6 format: 2 rdba: 0x00414d87 last change scn: 0x0000.3b6b9d19 seq: 0x1 flg: 0x06 spare1: 0x0 spare2: 0x0 spare3: 0x0 consistency value in tail: 0x970f0601 check value in block header: 0xe825 computed block checksum: 0x3c6b DBVERIFY - Verification complete Total Pages Examined : 640000 Total Pages Processed (Data) : 116312 Total Pages Failing (Data) : 1 Total Pages Processed (Index): 65914 Total Pages Failing (Index): 3 Total Pages Processed (Other): 64634 Total Pages Processed (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Failing (Seg) : 0 Total Pages Empty : 393138 Total Pages Marked Corrupt : 3 Total Pages Influx : 2 Highest block SCN : 1002028510 (0.1002028510)
这部分错误，其实处理起来也不困难，部分是业务表的index，但是其他的几乎都是AWR相关基表，有2个坏块跟是system相关的基表和索引，分别是I_H_OBJ#_COL#和COM$ ，HISTGRM$。
对于业务索引，很简单，直接drop 重建即可，对于这个sys的index，可以通过设置38003 event进行drop重建。
对于基表COM$,HISTGRM$，由于是非bootstrap$核心对象，其实也可以处理掉的。
处理方法
不过考虑到这种毕竟是存储掉电，undo异常的情况，还是重建库更稳妥一些。最后补充一点，这个库稍微有点奇葩的地方是全库1.2TB，其中有个表的LOB自动980GB，重建数据库是相对较慢的。对于大表，且有LOB自动，通常建议基于分片，否则会报ORA-01555错误的，如下是常用的一个基于rowid的分片脚本，供大家参考：
set verify off
undefine rowid_ranges
undefine segment_name
undefine owner
set head off
set pages 0
set trimspool on
select ‘where rowid between ”’ ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid1, c.bid1, 0) ||
”’ and ”’ ||
sys.dbms_rowid.rowid_create(1, d.oid, c.fid2, c.bid2, 9999) || ”” || ‘;’
from (select distinct b.rn,
first_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid1,
last_value(a.fid) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) fid2,
first_value(decode(sign(range2 – range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn – a.range1) * a.chunks1),
a.bid)) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid1,
last_value(decode(sign(range2 – range1),
1,
a.bid +
((b.rn – a.range1 + 1) * a.chunks1) – 1,
(a.bid + a.blocks – 1))) over(partition by b.rn order by a.fid, a.bid rows between unbounded preceding and unbounded following) bid2
from (select fid,
bid,
blocks,
chunks1,
trunc((sum2 – blocks + 1 – 0.1) / chunks1) range1,
trunc((sum2 – 0.1) / chunks1) range2
from (select /*+ rule */
relative_fno fid,
block_id bid,
blocks,
sum(blocks) over() sum1,
trunc((sum(blocks) over()) / &&rowid_ranges) chunks1,
sum(blocks) over(order by relative_fno, block_id) sum2
from dba_extents
where segment_name = upper(‘&&segment_name’)
and owner = upper(‘&&owner’))
where sum1 > &&rowid_ranges) a,
(select rownum – 1 rn
from dual
connect by level <= &&rowid_ranges) b
where b.rn between a.range1 and a.range2) c,
(select max(data_object_id) oid
from dba_objects
where object_name = upper(‘&&segment_name’)
and owner = upper(‘&&owner’)
and data_object_id is not null) d
/
总结
以上就是这篇文章的全部内容了，希望本文的内容对大家的学习或者工作具有一定的参考学习价值，如果有疑问大家可以留言交流，谢谢大家对的支持。
