性能优化 Oracle如何固定执行计划 SQL PROFILE概要文件分析

1.  引子

Oracle系统为了合理分配和使用系统的资源提出了概要文件的概念。所谓概要文件,就是一份描述如何使用系统的资源(主要是CPU资源)的配置文件。将概要文件赋予某个数据库用户,在用户连接并访问数据库服务器时,系统就按照概要文件给他分配资源。

包括:

1、管理数据库系统资源。

利用Profile来分配资源限额,必须把初始化参数resource_limit设置为true默认是TRUE的。

2、管理数据库口令及验证方式。

默认给用户分配的是DEFAULT概要文件,将该文件赋予了每个创建的用户。但该文件对资源没有任何限制,因此管理员常常需要根据自己数据库系统的环境自行建立概要文件。

2.  概要文件限制

概要文件主要可以对数据库系统如下指标进行限制。

1)用户的最大并发会话数(SESSION_PER_USER)

2)每个会话的CPU时钟限制(CPU_PER_SESSION)

3)每次调用的CPU时钟限制,调用包含解析、执行命令和获取数据等等。(CPU_PER_CALL)

4)最长连接时间。一个会话的连接时间超过指定时间之后,Oracle会自动的断开连接(CONNECT_TIME)

5)最长空闲时间。如果一个会话处于空闲状态超过指定时间,Oracle会自动断开连接(IDLE_TIME)

6)每个会话可以读取的最大数据块数量(LOGICAL_READS_PER_SESSION)

7)每次调用可以读取的最大数据块数量(LOGICAL_READS_PER_CALL)

8)SGA私有区域的最大容量(PRIVATE_SGA)

概要文件对口令的定义和限制如下:

1)登录失败的最大尝试次数(FAILED_LOGIN_ATTEMPTS)

2)口令的最长有效期(PASSWORD_LIFE_TIME)

3)口令在可以重用之前必须修改的次数(PASSWORD_REUSE_MAX)

4)口令在可以重用之前必须经过的天数(PASSWORD_REUSE_TIME)

5)超过登录失败的最大允许尝试次数后,账户被锁定的天数

6)指定用于判断口令复杂度的函数名

在指定概要文件之后,DBA可以手工的将概要文件赋予每个用户。但是概要文件不是立即生效,而是要将初始化参数文件中的参数RESOURCE_LIMIT设置为TRUE之后,概要文件才会生效。

3.  SQL PROFILE

SQL PROFILE在ORACLE10g中引入,主要目的侧重于SQL优化,弥补了存储概要的缺点.

DBA可以使用SQL调整顾问(STA)或SQL访问顾问(SAA)来识别可以得到更好性能的SQL语句, 

这些语句可以保存在SQL调整集、一个AWR快照或保存在当前的库缓存中,一旦识别出调整候选者, 这些顾问程序就开始分析捕获到的语句以期获得更好的性能,然后生成专用的语句扩展(就叫做SQL配置文件)并重写SQL语句以在执行期间获取更佳的性能。

  与存储概要类似,一个SQL配置文件提供了使用更好的执行计划的能力(如果这个执行计

划是可用的),SQL配置文件也可以象存储概要一样分阶段执行,或限制到对特定会话才能执行该SQL配置文件,但是大多数重要的改进超过了存储概要.

 SQLProfile对于一下类型语句有效:

    SELECT语句;

    UPDATE语句;

    INSERT语句(仅当使用SELECT子句时有效);

    DELETE语句;

    CREATE语句(仅当使用SELECT子句时有效);

    MERGE语句(仅当作UPDATE和INSERT操作时有效)。

另外,使用SQL Profile还必须有CREATE ANY SQL PROFILE、DROP ANY SQL PROFILE和ALTER ANY SQL PROFILE等系统权限。

4.  测试一

创建表

tpcc@TOADDB> create table t1 as selectobject_id,object_name from dba_objects where rownum<=50000;
Table created.
tpcc@TOADDB> create table t2 as select * fromdba_objects;
Table created.

创建索引:

tpcc@TOADDB> create index t2_idx on t2(object_id);
Index created.

收集统计信息:

tpcc@TOADDB> execdbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,’t1′,cascade=>true,method_opt=>’forall columns size 1′);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
tpcc@TOADDB> execdbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,’t1′,cascade=>true,method_opt=>’forall columns size 1′);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

执行无HINT的SQL

tpcc@TOADDB> set autotrace on
tpcc@TOADDB> select t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 wheret1.object_name like ‘%T1%’ and t1.object_id=t2.object_id;
42 rows selected.
Execution Plan
———————————————————-
Plan hash value: 1838229974
—————————————————————————
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
—————————————————————————
| 0| SELECT STATEMENT | | 2500 | 97K| 498 (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1| HASH JOIN | | 2500 | 97K| 498 (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2| TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 2500 | 72500 | 68 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3| TABLE ACCESS FULL| T2 | 92021 | 988K| 430 (1)| 00:00:01 |
—————————————————————————
Predicate Information (identified byoperation id):
—————————————————
1-access(“T1″.”OBJECT_ID”=”T2″.”OBJECT_ID”)
2- filter(“T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” LIKE ‘%T1%’ AND”T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” IS
NOT NULL)
Statistics
———————————————————-
1 recursive calls
0 dbblock gets
1789 consistent gets
0 physical reads
0 redosize
2350 bytes sent via SQL*Net toclient
573 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
42 rowsprocessed

执行带Hint的SQL

SQL>select /*+ use_nl(t1 t2) index(t2)*/ t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 where t1.object_name like ‘%T1%’ and t1.object_id=t2.object_id;
42 rows selected.
Execution Plan
———————————————————-
Plan hash value: 1022743391
—————————————————————————————
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|Time |
—————————————————————————————
| 0| SELECT STATEMENT | | 2500 | 97K| 5069 (1)|00:00:01 |
| 1| NESTED LOOPS | | 2500| 97K| 5069 (1)| 00:00:01 |
| 2| NESTED LOOPS | | 2500 | 97K| 5069 (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3| TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 | 2500 | 72500 | 68 (0)|00:00:01 |
|* 4| INDEX RANGE SCAN |T2_IDX | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2 | 1 | 11 | 2 (0)|00:00:01 |
—————————————————————————————
Predicate Information (identified byoperation id):
—————————————————
3- filter(“T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” LIKE ‘%T1%’ AND”T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” IS NOT
NULL)
4-access(“T1″.”OBJECT_ID”=”T2″.”OBJECT_ID”)
Statistics
———————————————————-
1 recursive calls
0 dbblock gets
304 consistent gets
24 physical reads
0 redosize
2350 bytes sent via SQL*Net toclient
573 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
0 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
42 rowsprocessed

使用SQL PROFILE

查找执行SQL的SQL_ID

tpcc@TOADDB> select sql_id,sql_text from v$sqlwhere sql_text like ‘%t1.object_name%’;
SQL_ID
————-
SQL_TEXT
—————————————————————————————————-
4zbqykx89yc8v
select t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 wheret1.object_name like ‘%T1%’ and t1.object_id=t2.object_id
18bphz37dajq9
select /*+ use_nl(t1 t2) index(t2) */t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 where t1.object_name like ‘%T1%’ and
t1.object_id=t2.object_id

运行存储过程如下:

var tuning_task varchar2(100);
DECLARE
l_sql_id v$session.prev_sql_id%TYPE;
l_tuning_task VARCHAR2(30);
BEGIN
l_sql_id:=’4zbqykx89yc8v’;
l_tuning_task := dbms_sqltune.create_tuning_task(sql_id =>l_sql_id);
:tuning_task:=l_tuning_task;
dbms_sqltune.execute_tuning_task(l_tuning_task);
dbms_output.put_line(l_tuning_task);
END;
/

TASK_114

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

查看task的名字

tpcc@TOADDB> print tuning_task;
TUNING_TASK
—————————————————————————————————-
TASK_114

查看执行报告

set long 99999
col comments format a200
SELECT dbms_sqltune.report_tuning_task(:tuning_task)COMMENTS FROM dual;
COMMENTS
—————————————————————————————————-
GENERAL INFORMATION SECTION
——————————————————————————-
Tuning Task Name : TASK_114
Tuning Task Owner : TPCC
Workload Type : Single SQL Statement
Scope : COMPREHENSIVE
Time Limit(seconds): 1800
Completion Status : COMPLETED
Started at : 03/06/2016 05:27:21
Completed at : 03/06/2016 05:27:24
——————————————————————————-
Schema Name: TPCC
SQL ID : 4zbqykx89yc8v
SQL Text : select t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 where t1.object_name like ‘%T1%’
and t1.object_id=t2.object_id
——————————————————————————-
FINDINGS SECTION (1 finding)
——————————————————————————-
1- SQL Profile Finding (see explain planssection below)
——————————————————–
Apotentially better execution plan was found for this statement.
Recommendation (estimated benefit: 83.08%)
——————————————
-Consider accepting the recommended SQL profile.
executedbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name => ‘TASK_114′,
task_owner =>’TPCC’, replace => TRUE);
Validation results
——————
TheSQL profile was tested by executing both its plan and the original plan
andmeasuring their respective execution statistics. A plan may have been
only partially executed if the other could be run to completion in lesstime.
Original Plan With SQL Profile % Improved
————- —————- ———-
Completion Status: COMPLETE COMPLETE
Elapsed Time (s): .012865 .004556 64.58 %
CPUTime (s): .0124 .0045 63.7%
User I/O Time (s): 0 0
Buffer Gets: 1787 302 83.1%
Physical Read Requests: 0 0
Physical Write Requests: 0 0
Physical Read Bytes: 0 0
Physical Write Bytes: 0 0
Rows Processed: 42 42
Fetches: 42 42
Executions: 1 1
Notes
—–
1.Statistics for the original plan were averaged over 10 executions.
2.Statistics for the SQL profile plan were averaged over 10 executions.
——————————————————————————-
EXPLAIN PLANS SECTION
——————————————————————————-
1- Original With Adjusted Cost
——————————
Plan hash value: 1838229974
—————————————————————————
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
—————————————————————————
| 0| SELECT STATEMENT | | 42 | 1680 | 498 (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1| HASH JOIN | | 42 | 1680 | 498 (1)| 00:00:01 |
|* 2| TABLE ACCESS FULL| T1 | 42 | 1218 | 68 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 3| TABLE ACCESS FULL| T2 | 92021 | 988K| 430 (1)| 00:00:01 |
—————————————————————————
Predicate Information (identified byoperation id):
—————————————————
1-access(“T1″.”OBJECT_ID”=”T2″.”OBJECT_ID”)
2- filter(“T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” LIKE ‘%T1%’ AND”T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” IS
NOT NULL)
2- Using SQL Profile
——————–
Plan hash value: 1022743391
—————————————————————————————
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|Time |
—————————————————————————————
| 0| SELECT STATEMENT | | 42 | 1680 | 152 (0)|00:00:01 |
| 1| NESTED LOOPS | | 42 | 1680 | 152 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 2| NESTED LOOPS | | 42 | 1680 | 152 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3| TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 | 42 | 1218 | 68 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4| INDEX RANGE SCAN |T2_IDX | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2 | 1 | 11 | 2 (0)|00:00:01 |
—————————————————————————————
Predicate Information (identified byoperation id):
—————————————————
3- filter(“T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” LIKE ‘%T1%’ AND”T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” IS NOT
NULL)
4-access(“T1″.”OBJECT_ID”=”T2″.”OBJECT_ID”)
——————————————————————————-

接受分析建议

报告中给出了执行方法,如上红色部分

接受报告的建议,验证一下如下:

tpcc@TOADDB> execute dbms_sqltune.accept_sql_profile(task_name=> ‘TASK_114’,task_owner => ‘TPCC’, replace => TRUE);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

执行测试

再执行原先命令如下:

tpcc@TOADDB> select t1.*,t2.owner from t1,t2 wheret1.object_name like ‘%T1%’ and t1.object_id=t2.object_id;
42 rows selected.
Execution Plan
———————————————————-
Plan hash value: 1022743391
—————————————————————————————
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|Time |
—————————————————————————————
| 0| SELECT STATEMENT | | 42 | 1680 | 152 (0)|00:00:01 |
| 1| NESTED LOOPS | | 42| 1680 | 152 (0)|00:00:01 |
| 2| NESTED LOOPS | | 42 | 1680 | 152 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 3| TABLE ACCESS FULL | T1 | 42 | 1218 | 68 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 4| INDEX RANGE SCAN |T2_IDX | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 5| TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T2 | 1 | 11 | 2 (0)|00:00:01 |
—————————————————————————————
Predicate Information (identified byoperation id):
—————————————————
3- filter(“T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” LIKE ‘%T1%’ AND”T1″.”OBJECT_NAME” IS NOT
NULL)
4-access(“T1″.”OBJECT_ID”=”T2″.”OBJECT_ID”)
Note
—–
– SQL profile”SYS_SQLPROF_01534b8309b90000″ used for this statement
– this is an adaptive plan
Statistics
———————————————————-
35 recursive calls
0 dbblock gets
317 consistent gets
1 physical reads
0 redosize
2350 bytes sent via SQL*Net toclient
573 bytes received via SQL*Net from client
4 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client
1 sorts (memory)
0 sorts (disk)
42 rowsprocessed

启用了PROFILE,PS:如果执行中多加几个空格,并不会影响PROFILE的生效的。

5.  维护操作

禁用命令
如下:

begin
dbms_sqltune.alter_sql_profile(
name => ‘SYS_SQLPROF_01534b8309b90000’,
attribute_name => ‘status’,
value => ‘disabled’);
end;
/

启用命令
如下:

begin
dbms_sqltune.alter_sql_profile(
name => ‘SYS_SQLPROF_01534b8309b90000’,
attribute_name => ‘status’,
value => ‘enabled’);
end;
/

查看使用的PROFILE

如下:

SQL>SELECT task_name,status FROMUSER_ADVISOR_TASKS ;

删除PROFILE

BEGIN
DBMS_SQLTUNE.DROP_SQL_PROFILE(name => ‘SYS_SQLPROF_01534b8309b90000’);
END;

总结

以上所述是小编给大家介绍的Oracle固定执行计划之SQL PROFILE概要文件 ,大家如有疑问可以留言,或者联系站长。感谢亲们支持!!!


数据运维技术 » 性能优化 Oracle如何固定执行计划 SQL PROFILE概要文件分析